Leading Quebec politician Andre Boisclair is in trouble because he said that a lot of the students at Harvard had "les yeux brides" - slanting eyes. Apparently French-speakers had no problems with that expression but Anglophone Canadians have been huffing and puffing about it.
If you can describe someone by such a physical characteristic as their skin-color, why can you not describe them by their eye shape? It is after all their eye-shape rather than their skin color that differentiates Asians from Caucasians.
The Duke of Edinburgh once used the expression "slitty eyes" to refer to Asians and that produced a bit of tutt-tutting too.
(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Page. Email me (John Ray) here.)
DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
Eh, I dunno JR.
ReplyDeleteThere can be plenty of things that are technically true but still offensive to say. An easy example: there might be a disproportionate amount of Jews who are lawyers or bankers. All things being equal, a politician who described a law school as "filled with Jews" would still come under fire - and quite rightly.
The question is whether this statement meant as an innocent description or as a genuine insult. And unfortunately, whether it's an accurate description or not tells us very little in that regard.