THE LEFT: WHICH STATUS QUO DO THEY ATTACK, AND WHICH DO THEY DEFEND?

THE LEFT DEFENDS THE STATUS QUO OF THE ENEMY:

(1) "WE DIDN'T HAVE TO INVADE; WE COULD'VE LEFT SADDAM IN POWER - THE IRAQIS WERE BETTER OFF.";

(2) WE CONTAINED THE USSR; REAGAN WAS WRONG TO THREATEN THEM; THEY FELL OF THEIR OWN WEIGHT."

(3) "IT IS CULTURAL HUBRIS TO IMPOSE DEMOCRACY ON ANYONE; LET EACH NATION AND EACH CULTURE DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES HOW THEY WANT TO SELF-REGULATE THEIR OWN SOCIETIES."

MEANWHILE, AT HOME, THE LEFT ASSAULTS OUR OWN STATUS QUO:

(4) NO "CHRISTMAS TREES" ALLOWED; NO "UNDER GOD" IN THE PLEDGE; NO "IN GOD WE TRUST" ON THE MONEY; NO PRAYER IN SCHOOL - (BECAUSE THEY WANT TO UNDERMINE THE STATUS QUO OF RELIGION).

(5) NO SOCIAL PREFERENCE FOR HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE - (BECAUSE THEY WANT TO UNDERMINE THE STATUS QUO OF MARRIAGE);

(6) NO PARENTAL NOTIFICATION IF A MINOR WANTS AN ABORTION - BECAUSE THEY WANT TO UNDERMINE THE STATUS QUO OF THE FAMILY).

It seems pretty clear to me that the Left CONSISTENTLY wants to maintain the strength our adversaries, and weaken the pillars of our own culture. The Left may NOT, therefore, be merely a Fifth Column; they might as well BE the enemy.