DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
Do you really think we ought to nuke them? That would kill an awfull lot of people. I remember reading an editorial in Maariv a while back which said the same thing. I disagreed with the idea then, and I disagree with it now.
Sorry if I was being thick. After that editorial in Maariv I don't know what to think.
I remember after 9/11 I would hear people on the radio calling for Bush to turn the Arab world into glass. i couldn't believe my ears. People really lose all sense of th
You know, I'm not big on all the bullshit that leftists lay at the doorstep of the U.S., but one thing I agree with is that, as THE Superpower we have responsibility. And, one of the biggest responsibilities we have is to show that WMD's should never be a first option.
A world where WMD's are considered a feasible option is a world on it's deathbed.
The reality is, if we were to attack NoKo, or Iran, they might very well respond with WMD's. Well, unfortunately that's the reality and the sacrifice we have to face and saddle. It's our responsibility.
If they do nuke us, I think we should remove them from the face of the Earth.
Do you really think we ought to nuke them? That would kill an awfull lot of people. I remember reading an editorial in Maariv a while back which said the same thing. I disagreed with the idea then, and I disagree with it now.
ReplyDeleteno. i don't think we can really nuke them. i meant it to express my being fed up with them.
ReplyDeleteas prairiepundit wrote today: the only real answer is regime change.
we need the chinese to help more. and the russians.
Sorry if I was being thick. After that editorial in Maariv I don't know what to think.
ReplyDeleteI remember after 9/11 I would hear people on the radio calling for Bush to turn the Arab world into glass. i couldn't believe my ears. People really lose all sense of th
yeah.
ReplyDeletenukes are not feqsible in the case of noko.
only a 15,000 weapon strong simutltaneous smart-bomb/guided misslie attack cpould neutralize them before the could kiill 1,000,000 sokos.
it would take less to neutralize iran's nume program.
i'd save our nukes for a post-WMD reprisal. no holds barred.
"post-WMD attack reprisal" - i meant to write.
ReplyDeleteYou know, I'm not big on all the bullshit that leftists lay at the doorstep of the U.S., but one thing I agree with is that, as THE Superpower we have responsibility. And, one of the biggest responsibilities we have is to show that WMD's should never be a first option.
ReplyDeleteA world where WMD's are considered a feasible option is a world on it's deathbed.
The reality is, if we were to attack NoKo, or Iran, they might very well respond with WMD's. Well, unfortunately that's the reality and the sacrifice we have to face and saddle. It's our responsibility.
If they do nuke us, I think we should remove them from the face of the Earth.