tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8475986.post113010975437548210..comments2024-03-21T05:29:07.463-04:00Comments on THE ASTUTE BLOGGERS: NYTIMES: FITZGERALD HASN'T DECIDED YETUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8475986.post-1130163871695244132005-10-24T10:24:00.000-04:002005-10-24T10:24:00.000-04:00http://news.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=us/13-0&fp=435c...http://news.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=us/13-0&fp=435cb1b73302f73c&ei=kexcQ8aQIsHmFfWsvM4M&url=http%3A//today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx%3Ftype%3DpoliticsNews%26storyID%3D2005-10-23T201348Z_01_MOR119416_RTRUKOC_0_US-BUSH-LEAK.xml%26archived%3DFalse&cid=0<BR/><BR/>"Fitzgerald is expected to give final notice to officials facing charges as early as Monday and may convene the grand jury on Tuesday, a day earlier than usual, to deliver a summary of the case and ask for approval of the possible indictments, legal sources said. The grand jury is to expire on Friday unless Fitzgerald extends it.<BR/><BR/>Fitzgerald could still determine that there was insufficient evidence to bring charges, but the lawyers said that appeared increasingly unlikely."<BR/><BR/>http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/10/23/lawyers_in_cia_leak_case_say_charges_possible_this_week/<BR/><BR/>their sources indicate that no decision has been made. as i wrote.Reliapundithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12942299527008194753noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8475986.post-1130112859962301212005-10-23T20:14:00.000-04:002005-10-23T20:14:00.000-04:00The Times headline does not match their story. Th...The Times headline does not match their story. They do not in fact have any information on whether Fitzgerald has "decided." They did not get an interview from him.<BR/><BR/>All they really know is when the GJ runs out. All else is guesses.<BR/><BR/>I think you are taking it even a step further than their poor headline though when you pronounce that Fitzgerald has "doubts."<BR/><BR/>link please? solid data?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com