tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8475986.post115125438688209211..comments2024-03-21T05:29:07.463-04:00Comments on THE ASTUTE BLOGGERS: WHO KILLED MORE IRAQIS: SADDAM AND AL QAEDA; U.N. SANCTIONS; OR THE PENTAGON?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8475986.post-1151309073063657532006-06-26T04:04:00.000-04:002006-06-26T04:04:00.000-04:00how'bout this one:4 out of 5 oscar nominees think ...how'bout this one:<BR/><BR/>4 out of 5 oscar nominees think we should abandon Iraq!<BR/><BR/>like they know more about foreign policy then they know about the interior decor of a winebago!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8475986.post-1151308973881356332006-06-26T04:02:00.000-04:002006-06-26T04:02:00.000-04:00love this phrase:"The vast majority of historians ...love this phrase:"The vast majority of historians agree " as if that meant it waws true!<BR/>ha! you fool...3 out of 4 dentists want to nuke iranAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8475986.post-1151308878854178782006-06-26T04:01:00.000-04:002006-06-26T04:01:00.000-04:00sounds like anon 350 is a nazi sympathiser to mesounds like anon 350 is a nazi sympathiser to meAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8475986.post-1151265038729758452006-06-25T15:50:00.000-04:002006-06-25T15:50:00.000-04:00Churchill is a LOSER who vowed never to lose the B...Churchill is a LOSER who vowed never to lose the British Empire but lost it during WW2,ignoring Hitler's olive branch.<BR/><BR/>Leaked CIA reports show the jihad is winning ,increasing ranks worldwide in good part due to US Iraq occupation.<BR/><BR/>The US aided BOTH sides in the Iraq Iran War but more Iraq than Iran. The strategy? To keep two of Israel's enemies busy fighting each other. This does not excuse their continuing the war which neither could win.<BR/><BR/>The vast majority of historians agree Hitler was an Anglophile who wanted a free hand in the East but who wanted the British Empire left intact. This wasn't good enough<BR/>for the LOSER OF THE EMPIRE,Churchill,no hero he-and not much admired by many in the UK.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8475986.post-1151259708674110952006-06-25T14:21:00.000-04:002006-06-25T14:21:00.000-04:00THIS IS AN EDITED VERSION OF "THE ERLANGER DEFEATI...THIS IS AN EDITED VERSION OF "THE ERLANGER DEFEATIST/ANTI-SEMITE"'S COMMENT:<BR/><BR/>1 - Erlanger first thanks ex-CIA Michael Scheuer - who is an ANTI-SEMITE who was ON DUTY and DERELICT during 9/11. Scheuer was IN CHARGE of the BINALDEN desk at thetime and KNEW NOTHIMNG of 9/11 for the 3-4 YEARs it was in planning. Scheuer BLAMES ISRAEL for the Iraq War. Like Chomsky and Sheehan and Moore and Moran and other ANTI-SEMITES.<BR/><BR/>2 - Then ERLANGER writes: "Specifically, no American whom has supported inteventionist policy in the Mideast can use the million figure, for as the author outlines, 500,000 of the deaths puportedly caused by Hussein were as a result of the Iraq-Iran War which Rumsfeld and the US helped instigate and aided at the time. The US aided Iraq with intellgence against Iran. The US even provided Saddam with anthrax to fight Iran."<BR/><BR/>THIS IS UTTER BULLSHIT. Does he remeber a little scandla called IRAN-CONTRA!? Reagin sold MISSILES to IRAN during the war, not Saddam. Saddam's mitltary was a CLIENT OF THE USSR at the time; Saddam's miltary ran on MIG and Soviet AK47's and Soviet tanks. NOT US MATERIEL.<BR/><BR/>AS KISSINGER SAID - AT THE TIME, ABOUT THE IRAN-IARQ WAR - (which was for all intents and purposes the US policy): "TOO BAD THEY BOITH CAN'T LOSE!"<BR/><BR/>3 - ERLANGER writes:<BR/><BR/>"The second "fact" is disingenuous: the only reason al Qaida can be claimed to be the "second front"<BR/>is the US bringing it there by the invasion. To use another's country as a "magnet" (we doubt this was the original intent of course)to attact a third adversary and fight that adversary on the non-offending country's soil is itself<BR/>immoral.<BR/><BR/>THIS IS UTTER NONSENSE. Would ERLANGER rather we fought them in the mountainous Hindu Lush, or haver them ALL in Saudi Arabia and Jordan, destabilizing the Middle East!? The flypaper startegy is good. BESIDES: AL WAEDA chose to makie it a front in the GWOT, not Bush.<BR/><BR/>4 - ERLANGER WROTE:<BR/><BR/>"Worse, it is self-defeating as leaked CIA Reports have told us Al Qaida has increased its recruiting as a result with enough left over to eventually come to the US and attack us here,jihadists who would otherwise not even have been recruited."<BR/><BR/>THIS IS UTTER NONSENSE: THERE IS NO RELIABLE RECRUITING DATAA. IN FACT, POLLS SHOW THE USA GAINING IN POPULARITY IN MUSLIM NATIONS.<BR/><BR/>5 - ERLANGER WROTE: <BR/><BR/>"There is a reason for war support declining to the low 30s."<BR/><BR/>The reason the war is unpopular at home is because the MSM wants it to be unpopular. The FACTS are INDISPUTABLE - in afct, ERLANGER doesn;t mention ANY of the facts I posted. HE CAN'T: THEY UUTERLY REFUTE HIS POSITION.<BR/><BR/>The MSM is Leftist and "anti-war" and anti-Bush. The MSM supported lib BJ CLINTON';s UNAUTHORIZED WAR AGAINST SERBIA. NO UN MANDATE - NOT EVEN A CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION! Even the NYTIMES supported WARRANTLESS search and seizure and warrantless DATA-MINING done by Clintoin and Carter. The MSM are partisaqn LEftists before ANYTHING else.<BR/><BR/>Erlanger is not a Leftist. He is a misguided dupe and an anti-Semite, isolationist/defeatist Bushcananite.<BR/><BR/>I like his posts - because he exposes the UTTER BANKRUPTCY of that side's policies.<BR/><BR/>I edited his idiotic personal attacks on me.<BR/><BR/>ADDENDUM: there is not one shred of evidence that the USA is an empire, or that we went to war for Big Oil or Israel. These arguments are falacious idiotic knee-jerk attemtps to buttress the position of ISOLATIONS and APPEASERS.<BR/><BR/>I ask ERLANGER to cite onbe single soliray event in all of human history whoich shows that ISOLATIONSIM and APPEASEMENT are benficial.<BR/><BR/>As CHURCHILL SAID (paraphrasing):<BR/><BR/>An appeaser is someone who feeds his neighbor to the crocodiule in the hopes that he will be eaten last."<BR/><BR/>Churchill also said (paraphrasing) - of appeasement and Chamberlain's deal with Herr Hitler -- called the Munich Pact:<BR/><BR/>Chamberlain had the chance to choose between war or dishonor and he chose DISHONOR, and soon he will also have war."<BR/><BR/>Appeasement only made Hitler stronger and the costs of defeating him worse.<BR/><BR/>Reagan was no appeaser. Thatcher was no appeaser. Neither is Bush. Thank the Lord.Reliapundithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12942299527008194753noreply@blogger.com