

He should have just forged the damn thing. Shame on the media for not telling them 'Nuts!' and gone down with guns blazing, or more likely, becoming heroes. WND is Woodward and Bernstein with principles.
Well done, CFP and NIN. Well done.
Canada Free Press & Northeast Intelligence Network Exclusive
Media Blackout on Obama eligibility dates back to November
By Douglas Hagmann & Judi McLeod Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Do you remember Watergate? Thirty-five years ago this Sunday, U.S. President Richard M. Nixon submitted his letter of resignation for his role in the scandal. There was the crime – the break-in, and then there was the cover-up by the Nixon administration. There were threats, media manipulation and disinformation. It was the cover-up more than the crime itself in the aftermath of the Watergate break-in that led to the downfall of the Nixon administration. It was a politically critical time for our country, but we survived because of the strength of the U.S. constitution.
Now, we potentially face a new constitutional crisis stemming from the refusal of Barack Hussein Obama to produce a one-page document that would confirm his eligibility to hold the highest office in the land. Eligibility to hold office is not a “fringe” matter, but a core constitutional issue that lies at the very heart of a growing controversy.
Although we do not have the birth certificate or proof of ineligibility, the Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press have documentation of a cover-up relating to the issue of Obama’s eligibility to hold office. The proof we possess not only exposes a well orchestrated cover-up, but also provides critical insight into why the topic of Obama’s eligibility has failed to gain traction in the corporate media.
The Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press are in possession of extremely sensitive investigative documents, including a stunning written admission by a nationally known talk show host stating that he was threatened with his career – or worse - should he talk about the issue of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth records to a national audience. This document was obtained on December 10, 2008, and provides explicit detail of a “gag order” imposed on this host before and immediately following the national election last November.
After receiving and authenticating the document, US based veteran private investigator Douglas J. Hagmann opened a full scale investigation into the media blackout, with specific emphasis on tracing the blackout origins to those issuing them. This investigation was conducted in conjunction with Judi McLeod, founding editor of Canada Free Press and Brian Thompson, CFP Information Technology chief following a meeting near Toronto, Ontario last December. At that meeting, it was decided to keep the existence of the document secret until additional evidence could be obtained.
Today, after an extensive eight month investigation, the Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press are breaking their silence and revealing explosive information about a widespread cover-up that began at the earliest stages of the Obama presidential campaign. The cover-up traces back to some of the most powerful and influential people in the U.S. and continues today.Summary of the Evidence
As noted above, we are in possession of a written account by a well known national talk show host who details how he was prohibited to discuss the controversy of Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility as president of the United States. This signed document cites exact dates and times when he was forbidden to discuss any aspect of the birth certificate controversy, and includes direct references to the individuals responsible for such prohibitions. Further, his statement identifies the individuals who originated the orders and their positions, and confirms that failure to adhere to the order would likely end his career in that industry. He also confirms that other, less specific but more menacing threats were implied during conversations with those making the subject off limits.
Although we possess the original document containing the name and contact information of the talk show host, we have decided not to publish his name or network affiliation at this time. Based on the correspondence from this individual and respecting the nature of the threats to him personally and professionally, it is our decision to allow him to enjoy anonymity until such time as he decides to reveal the facts himself at a time of his choosing.
From multiple interviews conducted within the last eight months, we have obtained information from other sources, independent of the above, who have also been instructed to avoid any discussion of the birth certificate issue at all costs, to wit:
The account of an administrative assistant employed in New York City by a cable network news station who provided significant, detailed information of a 2008 meeting between the top network executive and four-(4) well-known news anchors. This source confirmed that she drafted the memo to the various hosts to notify them of the date, time and location of this high-level meeting at the request of the network’s top executive.
Present at this meeting, she verified that the network official issued “warnings” to the personalities “to avoid any on-air discussion of the birth place, eligibility, and news accounts of litigation compelling [Barack Hussein] Obama to produce a legitimate copy of his birth certificate.” She stated that the network executive had her arrange the conference immediately following a meeting “between [the network executive] and an attorney closely associated with candidate Obama who was acting on his behalf.”
The statement of a corporate secretary for a major news network confirming the existence of a one-page inter-office memo, bearing the markings “confidential” and “not for dissemination,” addressed and distributed to news anchors and on-air talent” that specifically instructed the recipients to avoid any discussion pertaining to the Obama birth certificate controversy. The memo was written and distributed in October 2008, and specifically instructed on-air talent to “advise guests, as necessary, to refrain from citing any news story, legal proceedings, Internet ‘blogs’ or other sources that pertain to the ongoing eligibility controversy of future President Barack Obama.”
As outlined above, our Investigation has uncovered both direct and indirect evidence of threats being made against some of the nation’s top radio and television personalities, which would explain some giving this topic mere lip service. As one source interviewed during the course of this investigation stated, “I’ve got a career and family to think about.”
Although no one should be surprised over the manipulation of the news, the nature of this manipulation, and the extent of the threats against journalists, should shock even the most well grounded.
Any reasonable person must question the motivation of the media moguls. The individuals who have – and continue to threaten talk show hosts, news anchors, and others are the top people. We are not talking about mid or upper level management – this is from the very top in all cases. If there is nothing to the birth certificate issue and the question of eligibility, why the secrecy?
12 comments:
Shocking. Private companies are telling their employees what to do in their jobs. Who would have thought that private companies would do such a thing. Maybe we should take away the rights of private companies to tell their employees what to do.
Anonymous, these journalists are supposed to be impartial and fearless, following sources wherever they may lead. To be told not even to chase a story, whether the story ends up legit or not, is sad.
I'm sure if you heard it was Bush that journalists were trying to cover for, you'd be screaming for blood...his and theirs.
For me, the blackout would explain a whole lot of what I've heard - or not heard - on allegedly conservative talk radio (Boortz, Beck, just to name two).
I think it was Hannity who they threatened. Beck wasn't working in December and O'Reilly's a moron on the subject. It might have been Dobbs, too, but then it's weird that he came out asked about it recently. All the rest are apparatchiks. It had to be Hannity.
Some cool Tea Party stuff can be found at http://tinyurl.com/superfreedom
jdamn, I don't listen to Hannity only b/c I find him annoying to hear (not b/c I necessarily disagree with him). But flipping by his radio show, I coulda swore I've heard him at least mention the issue. Does he talk it down the way Beck and Boortz do?
Whatever this may say about Hannity himself I'm not sure, but I poked around the msg board at his site. The forum mod posted this sticky regarding posts and EVEN COMMENTS IN PASSING on the birth issue:
********************
Final Warning.
You people better start telling your friends. I've given 3 days for the word to spread, along with posting this sticky at the top of the TTTM.
The bans are about to commence.
**********************
Well well well. The birth thing appears to be the one topic Hannity's listeners are not allowed to discuss AT ALL lest they be smitten.
On second thought, jdamn, I seriously doubt it's Hannity (posting this link only for the clip):
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907160002
My guess is Boortz...just something about the host's quote sounds a lot like him.
Great post! I really like your blog!! Keep up the great work!!!
COMMON CENTS
http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com
ps. Link Exchange??
Hi Frank,
It could be Boortz but I got the distinct impression that this was one of the big 3 cable networks, not talk radio. I don't listen to Hannity's radio show, but I watch him on TV. He has been known to censor his forum because he's a dhimmi, but he'll ordinarily just wail on Obama. That pre-election special on Obama's shadiness and scary associations was incredible. I just can't think of who else it would be. Yeah, he talks it down, but that's par for the course with him. He always tries to make the distinction between unicorn 'moderate' Islam and radical Islam and such, but he and O'Reilly were the only ones who covered the 'Kill All the Jews' rallies last winter, so he's more courageous than most hosts.
Looking back at the article, though, it seems like it has to be someone with a live show, so I can't imagine who else it would be besides Cavtuo except maybe Scarborough, but MSNBC? I don't know. It matters not. What's of consequence is the thuggery and intimidation, plus confirmation that there really was a blackout and it really was intentional.
I also just think it's awesome that NIN investigated it.
I also don't think it was talk radio because Savage has been talking about it for months and nothing happened to him.
Anonymous, these journalists are supposed to be impartial and fearless, following sources wherever they may lead. To be told not even to chase a story, whether the story ends up legit or not, is sad.
Editors tell their reporters what to chase all the time. Somebody calls in a story. It seems unlikely. But if it were true, it would be news. What is the cost-effectiveness of trying to find out the truth in this case? e editor knows. The reporter does not.
Publishers tell editors what will sell newspapers. It's a business. Publishers tell editors how much they can spend. "We can't afford another trip to Kenya to try to find a birth certificate that does not exist." A cost-benefit calculation.
Then there is the question of whether something has been already so well played that it is no longer interesting. See any stories lately on Credit Default Swaps?
Then there is the question of whether it IS news. News consists of facts, not speculation. Prove that Obama's mother was ever in Kenya in 1961, and you have a fact. If you say, 'we cannot know because the files in Kenya are sealed," then prove that the files in Kenya are sealed.
Until then, well there is still speculation that the US government has the bodies of space aliens stored in Rosewell, New Mexico.
We can overcome media silence by posting on news articles and blogs. Truth will win.
There is an abundance of evidence that there is a man with dual loyalties to other nations in the White House. Racism is when you ignore good or bad qualities in a person because of race. This natural born citizen issue was investigated over John McCain, but not about Barack Obama; why not? Was that racism, blindness or politics?
The president is the strongest witness against himself by hiding and rejecting access to simple records: school, health, passport, and full birth certificate. The real question is, What is blinding his supporters that they do not press him to release his documents? Racism? definitely for some. For many it is because he supports their issues of abortion, gay unions and issues, money interests, or intimidation to loss of jobs or access to the president (CNN and other media) or position in Congress. He got Major Cook fired for questioning his legal right to be president in the courts. This is overstepping his authority and is closer to dictatorship.
Bill Maher gave a dialogue: "Birthers Must Be Stopped" Ridicule is a Communist tactic “when the sane are made to appear insane and the insane act as the world’s psychiatrists…” a quote from Mind-Washing in America by Senator Jack Tenney. Very few can brainwash the majority of citizens. If we want to end brainwashing, we better call for the truth while we still can. All the president has to do is release the documents he is hiding. We refused to hear before the election and investigate; now it is even more important.
I sent an email to President Obama & US Attorney in DC, CD Phillips on 7-30-09. The president is a 15 year citizen of Indonesia and should not be making decisions for America.
Subject: Authority to investigate Barack Obama
& Quo Warranto in Donofrio
Same authority to investigate terrorists in America
(Quo Warranto-Wikipedia: Quo warranto today
In the United States today, quo warranto usually arises in a civil case as a plaintiff's claim (and thus a "cause of action" instead of a writ) that some governmental or corporate official was not validly elected to that office or is wrongfully exercising powers beyond (or ultra vires) those authorized by statute or by the corporation's charter.)
114 Char. Twitter:
Sharing “Questions E-mailed to President Obama & US Attorney DC, CD Phillips 7-30-09” http://www.divine-way.com
Charges and evidences are given, court style at http://obama-birth-cert-forged-sss-impeach.blogspot.com
and
http://www.divine-way.com/forgery_evidences_sss_reg_colb_birth_cert_for_obama_impeachment.html
If these sources are unwilling to divulge the identity of national talk show host, then they're wasting everyone's time. And if the talk how was so intimidated, why would s/he have purportedly provided the statement in the first place. Fishy. Adding another layer of mystery to this eligibility issue is a singlular disservice to all those seeking the truth. Better to have said nothing at all. Titilating is not informing.
Post a Comment