"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Thursday, May 31, 2007

NASA CHIEF ON GLOBAL WARMING: The Astute Bloggers scoops the blogosphere, once again

We posted on this story on 5/30/07 at 7:39PM. (We linked to SPACE DAILY.)

We beat ABCNews, Drudge, Memeorandum, Newsbusters, American Digest, The Raw Story, The Carpetbagger Report, Balloon Juice, Blue Crab Boulevard, Daily Kos, CJR - AND EVERYONE ELSE - by a day.

We saw the story first, saw its importance, and brought it to the attention of our loyal readers BEFORE anyone else.

We don't follow; we lead.


SPREAD THE WORD.
BLOGROLL US.

Defeated By Pornography

I have a rather long post up on how Islamic Fascism is being Defeated By Pornography. It is true pornography is a problem for some in the West. However, Islam as it is pushed by the Saudis, has no defence.

I cover the whole scene from porno on cells to Saudi Web Cam Girls, with a fair amount of social commentary and Grand Strategy thrown in.

IMPORTANT SHOW OF JUSTICE: POLICE BRUTALITY CONVICTED

This is something that I wrote about two years ago, about an Israeli police offier who committed an act of violence against a right-wing protestor during the disengagement monstrosity, totally out of line in any democratic society. Now, he and another one involved in this have been convicted of their crime, which in my mind was done out of their political positions(?):
(IsraelNN.com) The Tel Aviv Magistrates Court has found two policemen guilty of brutality against an "orange" anti-Disengagement protestor - thanks to an on-site video taken by Arutz-7 journalist-cameraman Tuvia Lerner.

The two Yassam-unit policemen, Eran Naim and Eliran Avraham, were found guilty of beating demonstrator Akiva Vitkin without cause during an anti-Disengagement road-blocking demonstration on June 29, 2005. Naim is seen in the video appearing to be trying to pull Vitkin's nose off by sticking his fingers in his nostrils from behind and pulling up, and Avraham later beat Vitkin repeatedly in the police station.

Solid Evidence
The judge wrote that he had been presented with solid evidence by the plaintiffs, while the police defendants provided only weak testimonies in their favor. This, after observers said he appeared to express sympathy with the policemen at various points during the trial.

The policemen's lawyer claimed during the trial that Vitkin had committed grave acts by lying on the road and blocking traffic, including that of security vehicles. Orit Strook, of the Yesha Civil Rights organization, said that the judge ruled that police may use reasonable force when in danger or to make an arrest, but not as punishment. It was Strook's organization, together with Atty. Nadav HaEtzni, that filed the suit against the policemen.

Legitimate Tactic
The policemen's lawyer also stated that "fingers in nostrils" is a legitimate police tactic against demonstrators, one that is studied in the police martial arts school. The judge later stated that the major issue of the case is how to set the limits of police force against demonstrators.

Officer Eran Naim was caught on tape by Arutz-7’s Lerner taking part in what Lerner later said was a "cruel, shocking and pre-meditated attack." Despite attempts by the police to obstruct his view by standing tightly around the victim, Lerner managed to film the attack on a digital camera. Naim is first seen on motioning to his colleagues to help beat the demonstrator, after which they sit on him and stick their fingers in his nose and mouth, causing extensive bleeding and facial injuries. Naim is also seen beating 58-year-old Rabbi Dr. Yisrael Katz, after the Rabbi appealed to him to refrain from beating girls present at the road-blocking.
There's a video of this at the INN page, and if you have the stomach for any graphic acts that appear there, you can see it for yourself.

And with that, let's take a moment now to ask some questions: what kind of lawyer does this beneath-humanity police officer have, who justifies violence? And will he and others of his ilk be legitimizing pedophilia next? Nor can I see the logic in assaulting someone blocking traffic, when it's quite possible to just simply drag them out of the way. Forget it, the man is an inferior product of a bad education system who shouldn't be part of society anymore.

Let this be a lesson to one and all about what kind of corruption plagues some of the Israeli police, and that needs to be cleansed. With this conviction today, we'll hopefully be reaching the point where that'll be done.

"White supremacist" to call for equal treatment of blacks and whites?

I guess Martin Luther King must have been a white supremacist at that rate:

"Close to 300 Knoxville police officers, Knox County sheriff's deputies, and Tennessee Highway Patrol troopers kept close watch over a white supremacist rally Saturday in downtown Knoxville.

The 30 or so protestors came from across the United States to Knoxville to argue that national and local media are not giving enough attention to black-on-white crimes. The issue they are thrusting to the center of their message is the double murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom.

Source

I have myself commented (scroll down) about the way the atrocious crime concerned has been ignored by the major media -- in contrast to the way the non-crime of the Duke lacrosse players was splashed nationwide.

But I too have been labelled a "white supremacist" for opposing racial preferences (i.e. "affirmative action") so I guess that what we see above is just the usual Leftist substitution of abuse for rational argument.

George Orwell portrayed Leftists as using words to mean the opposite of what they really described and we certainly see a lot of that today.

Ace has some thoughtful comments on the media behavior in the matter.

(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)

Americans will die for liberty

Excerpts from a British writer:

We are inclined, in our snobbish way, to dismiss the Americans as a new and vulgar people, whose civilisation has hardly risen above the level of cowboys and Indians. Yet the United States of America is actually the oldest republic in the world, with a constitution that is one of the noblest works of man. When one strips away the distracting symbols of modernity - motor cars, skyscrapers, space rockets, microchips, junk food - one finds an essentially 18th-century country.

The sense of entering an older country, and one with a sterner sense of purpose than is found among the flippant and inconstant Europeans, can be enjoyed even before one gets off the plane. On the immigration forms that one has to fill in, one is asked: "Have you ever been arrested or convicted for an offence or crime involving moral turpitude?" Who now would dare to pose such a question in Europe? The very word "turpitude" brings a smile, almost a sneer, to our lips.

The quiet solicitude that Americans show for the comfort of their visitors, and the tact with which they make one feel at home, can only be described as gentlemanly. These graceful manners, so often overlooked by brash European tourists, whisper the last enchantments of an earlier and more dignified age, when liberty was not confused with licence.

But lest these impressions of the United States seem unduly favourable, it should be added that the Americans have not remained in happy possession of their free constitution without cost. Thomas Jefferson warned that the tree of liberty must be watered from time to time with the blood of tyrants and patriots. To the Americans, the idea that freedom and democracy exact a cost in blood is second nature...

The Americans are prepared to use force in pursuit of what they regard as noble aims. It is yet another respect in which they are rather old-fashioned. They are patriots who venerate their nation and their flag.

The idea has somehow gained currency in Britain that America is an essentially peaceful nation. Quite how this notion took root, I do not know. Perhaps we were unduly impressed by the protesters against the Vietnam war. It is an idea that cannot survive a visit to the National Museum of American History in Washington, where one is informed that the "price of freedom" is over and over again paid in blood.... when the Americans speak of freedom, we should not imagine, in our cynical and worldly-wise way, that they are merely using that word as a cloak for realpolitik. They are not above realpolitik, but they also mean what they say. These formidable people think freedom is so valuable that it is worth dying for.

Source

(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)

A NEW ALLIANCE?


It seems like nothing of great import has been happening in Denmark lately - at least the kind of headline grabbing event the news industry craves.

While I have not contributed here in quite some time I doubt anyone has missed my contribution to the information-heap.

Then again - there have been some important tidal shifts occurring in the political scene here which may interest some of you.

Perhaps you might recall that the Swedish Social Democratic Government was defeated at the polls by a new coalition called the Alliance Party. Something similar may be developing here in Denmark. Two members of the Radical Party,Naser Khader and Anders Samuelsen - (The Radical is a liberal party which broke from the farmers Left party about 100 years ago and was for many years the party that tipped the paliamentary scales...) and one member of the Conservative Party, Gitte Seeberg - have formed New Alliance Party.

The birth of this party is a result of years of frustration with for example the tax-stop which essentially froze fiscal policy, and the controversies surrounding the sitting Governments support party - the right wing Dansk Folkeparty (danish peoples party). And whether or not one supports the New Alliance the general consensus is that it is positive for democracy that they will challenge what has otherwise become a stalemate.

While the political deadlock has slowly been calcifying - the catalyst to the emergence of this new party has been a central issue in Danish politics: immigration and Islam. Members of the Danish Folkparty protested the possibility that a potential member of parliament could speak in parliament while wearing a head-covering. One even compared the Islamic Women's head-covering with the Nazi's Swastika - and the Koran with Mein Kampf. One of Khader's colleagues in the Radical wore a headdress to defend the right of women to wear head-covering - she is shown above standing next to a statue of a traditional fishmonger...Khader claimed that this was the straw that borke the camel's back - as a moderate muslim the defense of the head-covering by his colleague was too much. (afterwards there was much hullaballoo about the veracity of Khader's claim).

Personally I find the comparison of the muslim women's headgear to a Swastika offensive - I believe the comparison to a yellow Star of David more apt.

Women should be free to choose their attire - not be forced to wear it. I believe the extreme right wingers speak with a kernel of truth when they alarm us to the dangers of Islamic Fundamentalists - but their statements are easily interpreted as racist.

After the summer we will see if the New Alliance Party has a positive influence on Danish Politics. Meanwhile I look forward to a real NEW ALLIANCE which will work to guarantee the rights of women oppressed by Islamic and Tribal traditions.

VALERIE PLAME'S 3 VERSIONS OF THE TRUTH

While Scooter Libby had his life and career destroyed because of Plamegate, those who had the biggest issue with the truth, Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson walk around free of consequences.

My awesome Senator Kit Bond is saying not so fast. As Vice-Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee he is a little troubled by the fact that Valerie Plame has no less than 3 different versions of how her husband was chosen to go to Niger.

VALERIE PLAME'S 3 VERSIONS:
1) To the CIA inspector general, she said that she suggested her husband for the trip.

2) To the Senate Intelligence Committee staff, she said she could not remember whether she suggested her husband or if her boss did.

3) To the House Committee, she said she did not suggest him.

In Plame's testimony to the House she said that her February 12, 2002 memo was taken out of context by the Senate. When I look at the memo it looks pretty clear to me that she was recommending her husband for the trip, maybe a liberal can point out to me what in the memo (posted below) is being taken out of context:
The report forwarded below has prompted me to send this on to you and request your comments and opinion. Briefly, it seems that Niger has signed a contract with Iraq to sell them uranium. The IC [Intelligence Community] is getting spun up about this for obvious reasons. The embassy in Niamey has taken the position that this report can’t be true — they have such cozy relations with the GON [Government of Niger] that they would know if something like this transpired.

So where do I fit in? As you may recall, [redacted] of CP/[office 2] recently approached my husband to possibly use his contacts in Niger to investigate [a separate Niger matter]. After many fits and starts, [redacted] finally advised that the station wished to pursue this with liaison. My husband is willing to help, if it makes sense, but no problem if not. End of story.

Now, with this report, it is clear that the IC is still wondering what is going on… my husband has good relations with both the PM and the former minister of mines, not to mention lots of French contacts, both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity. To be frank with you, I was somewhat embarrassed by the agency’s sloppy work last go-round, and I am hesitant to suggest anything again. However, [my husband] may be in a position to assist. Therefore, request your thoughts on what, if anything, to pursue here. Thank you for your time on this.

As a result, Senator Kit Bond has:
written to the CIA asking to interview the people said to be involved. He also wants to reinterview Valerie Plame Wilson herself.

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

PUTIN : NMD :: GORBACHEV : PERSHING MISSILES


PUTIN:
Russian President Vladimir Putin has cautioned against turning Europe into a "powder keg", referring to Washington's plans to deploy elements of its missile defense system in Europe.

"We consider it harmful and dangerous to turn Europe into a "powder keg" and to fill it with new kinds of weapons," Putin told a news conference after talks with the Portuguese prime minister in Moscow.


"It creates new unneeded risks for the entire system of international and European relations," he said.

WE HEARD THIS KIND OF ACCUSATION FROM THE LEFT IN THE 1980'S. THEM THEY ACCUSED REAGAN OF BEING A WARMONGER, WHEN HE REBUILT OUR MILITARY DEFENSES.

MILLIONS PROTESTED.

BUT HE WENT AHEAD AND DEPLOYED THE PERSHING II MISSILES DESPITE HUGE PROTESTS WORLDWIDE THAT HE WAS DESTABILIZING THE WORLD AND CREATING A WORSE ARMS RACE.

WIKI:
380 Pershing II missiles were made. They were first deployed in West Germany from January 1984 and the European deployment was completed in late 1985 with a total of 108 launchers.
I WAS OPPOSED TO REAGAN AND THE PERSHINGS AT THE TIME - AND I MARCHED WITH A MILLION OTHER LEFTIES IN CENTRAL PARK; THE EURO-LEFT PROTESTED EN MASSE, TOO. THEY HATED REAGAN THEN AS THEY HATE BUSH NOW.

BUT REAGAN WAS RIGHT. HIS ARMS BUILD UP AND THE PERSHING DEPLOYMENT HELPED DESTROY THE USSR TYRANNY. WE ON THE LEFT WERE WRONG. I THANK GOD THAT I HAVE LEARNED FORM MY MISTAKE. THAT'S WHY I NOW KNOW THAT:
BUSH IS RIGHT, NOW: WE NEED NMD.
YET THE DEMS WANT TO CUT NMD.

THEY'D DISARM US UNILATERALLY IF THEY COULD. FOR THE COMMON GOOD OF COURSE.

THEY'RE WORSE NOW THAN THEY WERE IN THE 1980'S.

THEY'RE AS WELL-MEANING AND AS WRONG NOW AS CHAMBERLAIN WAS IN THE 1930'S.

THIS IS ANOTHER MAJOR REASON WE MUSTN'T LET THEM TAKE THE WHITE HOUSE AND KEEP CONGRESS: THEY'LL WEAKEN US, AND THIS WILL EMBOLDEN OUR ENEMIES.

SARKOZY CONTINUES TO SHINE, DAZZLE AND AMAZE

HE IS POLLING INCREDIBLY WELL - WASH POST/REUTERS:
New French President Nicolas Sarkozy is set to secure a big majority in parliament next month, according to a poll for the Paris Match magazine released on Wednesday.

An Ifop poll gave Sarkozy's ruling Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) 41 percent of the vote in a June 10 first round ballot, a rise of 4 points on the previous poll.
... Ifop said the survey suggested Sarkozy's party would win 410-450 seats in the 577-member National Assembly, with 90-130 seats for the Socialists.
THE ELYSEE IS THE NEW CAMELOT - NYTIMES:
To their admirers, the Sarkozys are the French Kennedys: the president is outdoorsy and athletic, the first lady beautiful and designer-dressed, the passel of children smiling and photogenic. ... At least for now, some of the fiercest critics of Mr. Sarkozy are dazzled by his energy and hopeful that he will fulfill even some of his promises for reforming France quickly....

Activism is the leitmotif of this presidency. Mr. Sarkozy has been described as the “lapin Duracell” — the Energizer bunny — of politics. Perhaps a more apt comparison is Alice in Wonderland’s white rabbit, perpetually rushing to a very important date. ...

Mr. Sarkozy’s style has translated into a historically high popularity rating. According to a poll published Sunday in Le Journal du Dimanche, 65 percent of those questioned are “satisfied” with their new president, the highest early rating since the beginning of the Fifth Republic in 1958, according to the polling institute IFOP.
“Kennedy has come back,” wrote Le Point. “He’s named Sarkozy. Never has a president shown such a relaxed nature, such an absence of complexes.”
WITH A POPULAR PRESIDENT COMMITTED TO DARING CHANGES, FRANCE CAN ANd WILL ENACT HIS REFORMS AND THEN COME BACK BETTER THAN EVER.

NASA CHIEF: GLOBAL WARMING NOT NECESSARILY A PROBLEM, OR SOMETHING WE CAN CHANGE

SPACE DAILY:
Michael Griffin NASA Administrator has told America's National Public Radio that while he has no doubt a trend of global warming exists "I am not sure that it is fair to say that it is a problem we must wrestle with."

In an interview with NPR's Steve Inskeep that will air in Thursday's edition of NPR News' Morning Edition ...

INSKEEP: And I just wanted to make sure that I'm clear. Do you have any doubt that this is a problem that mankind has to wrestle with?

GRIFFIN: I have no doubt that global -- that a trend of global warming exists. I am not sure that it is fair to say that it is a problem we must wrestle with. To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state of earth's climate today is the optimal climate, the best climate that we could have or ever have had and that we need to take steps to make sure that it doesn't change.

First of all, I don't think it's within the power of human beings to assure that the climate does not change, as millions of years of history have shown, and second of all, I guess I would ask which human beings - where and when - are to be accorded the privilege of deciding that this particular climate that we have right here today, right now is the best climate for all other human beings. I think that's a rather arrogant position for people to take.
THE LEFTIST AGW CROWD IS ARROGANT. AND THEIR POLICIES ARE A BIGGER THREAT TO HUMANITY THAN CLIMATE CHANGE.

FITZGERALD, PLAME-WILSON, NOVAK AND ARMITAGE

COMPLETE AND COMPLETELY BRILLIANT ROUND UP AT JOM.

BOTTOM-LINE: IF LEAKING PLAME'S ID WAS A VIOLATION OF THE IIPA (AS FITZGERALD NOW SEEMS TO ARGUE), THEN WHY WASN'T ARMITAGE INDICTED? ARMITAGE WAS THE LEAKER. NOT LIBBY OR ANYONE ELSE AT THE WHITE HOUSE.


(THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER LIBBY LIED OR NOT DURING THE INVESTIGATION.) REPEAT:
ARMITAGE WAS THE LEAKER, NOT LIBBY.
ARMITAGE WAS THE LEAKER, NOT LIBBY.
ARMITAGE WAS THE LEAKER, NOT LIBBY.
ARMITAGE WAS NOT INDICTED BECAUSE IT DID NOT FIT THE STORY TEMPLATE, WHICH WAS THAT PLAME'S NAME WAS LEAKED BY THE WHITE HOUSE/CHENEY TO GET BACK AT JOE WILSON.

THIS STORY TEMPLATE HAS GOT MORE HOLES IN IT THAN A TON OF EMMENTHAL.

  • THOSE 16 WORDS BUSH SAID IN THE SOTU WERE TRUE THEN AND ARE TRUE TODAY.
  • CONGRESS HAD ALREADY VOTED ON THE AUTHORIZATION, (SO THOSE 16 WORDS HAD NO EFFECT AND COULD HAVE NONE ON OUR "RUSH TO WAR").
  • WILSON'S REPORT TO THE CIA DID NOT DISPROVE THOSE WORDS.
  • ARMITAGE LEAKED THE PLAME-WILSON CONNECTION TO BOLSTER WILSON, NOT AS RETRIBUTION.
THE "PLAME-WILSON REVENGE" MEME IS JUST ONE OF A HOST OF FALSE MEMES THE LEFT BELIEVES IN - LIKE:

  • GLOBAL WARMING IS ANTHROPOGENIC, AND MUST BE HALTED - AND CAN BE BY LIMITING MAN-MADE CO2;
  • GOVERNMENT REDISTRIBUTION OF PERSONAL INCOME IS THE BEST WAY TO HELP THE POOR;
  • NMD INCREASES INSTABILITY;
  • THE UN IS A FORCE FOR GOOD INTERNATIONALLY;
  • AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS IS GOOD;
  • THERE IS NO AL QAEDA IN IRAQ - AND SADDAM NEVER HAD ANY CONTACT WITH THEM ANYHOW;
  • ISRAEL AND BUSH ARE THE CAUSE OF GLOBAL JIHAD;
  • THE WEST IS THE CAUSE OF THIRD WORLD POVERTY;
  • ABORTION IS FINE;
  • NATIONALIZED HEALTHCARE IS EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE;
  • AND SO ON.

NONE OF THESE ARE TRUE. AND CONVINCING PEOPLE OF THEIR FALSEHOOD IS WHAT THIS BLOG IS ALL ABOUT.

FROM THE UK: MORE PROOF THE ACADEMY IS A BASTION OF LEFTIST DHIMMITUDE AND ANTI-SEMITISM

THE PROFESSORS WHO COMPRISE MOST OF THE COLLEGES IN THE UK - (AND THE USA, TOO) - HAVE TOLD US WHO THEY REALLY ARE:

HAARETZ:
Britain's University and College Union (UCU) voted Wednesday to promote a boycott of Israeli academic institutions, protesting Israel's policy on the Palestinians.

Jewish and Israeli officials in the United Kingdom and Israel reacted with outrage to the motion which, for the most part, is a rhetorical move. The motion was approved by a 158 to 99 vote, and called for freezing European funding for Israeli academic institutions, while condemning "Israeli academia's cooperation with the occupation."

In addition, the UCU decided to bring the question of whether to boycott Israel up for discussion by all the union's members, numbering about 120,000. The discussions are scheduled to take place over the next 12 months. The motion encouraged union members to "consider the moral implications of conducting ties with Israeli academic institutions."
RANT ALERT:

THESE LEFTIST, UNONIZED PROF'S ARE PROTESTING THE BRILLIANT TEACHERS AND RESEARCHERS OF THE PLURALIST DEMOCRACY OF ISRAEL - (WHICH IS UNDER SIEGE BY ISLAMO-FASCISM).

THEY HAVE NEVER PROTESTED OR DEMANDED THE BOYCOTT OF ANY ISLAMO-FASCIST STATE. NOT SADDAM'S IRAQ, NOT SYRIA, NOT IRAN. NOT EVEN CHINA OR NORTH KOREA OR CUBA OR ZIMBABWE.

NONE OF WHICH HAVE EVER HAD ANY ACADEMIC FREEDOM.

THESE PROFESSORS ARE POSTMODERNIST, CULTURAL AND MORAL RELATIVIST, SELF-HATING WESTERNERS WHO WANT JUDEO-CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION - (AKA THE WEST/THE FREE WORLD) - BROUGHT UNDER TRANSNATIONAL SOCIALIST (ATHEISTIC) HEGEMONY.

THEY GAVE AN AFFINITY WITH THE ISLAMO-FASCISTS BECAUSE THEY FEEL THAT THEY CAN HELP BRING ABOUT THE DEMISE OF THE WEST.

THEY ARE MISTAKEN. ABOUT ISRAEL, THE USA, THE WEST - AND THE NATURE OF THE REAL ENEMY.

BESIDES: ANYBODY WHO STANDS WITH THE PALESTINIANS - AFTER WITNESSING HOW THEY'VE BEEN TREATING EACH OTHER IN GAZA --- WITHOUT ANY OCCUPATION - IS A FOOL.

THE FRED! EFFECT

AS LMC REVEALED EARLIER, FRED! ANNOUNCES HE'S FORMING A PRE-ANNOUNCEMENT COMMITTEE AND THE STOCK MARKET LEAPS UPWARD.

IT'S THE FRED! EFFECT!

AND IT'S A LOT BETTER THAN THE GORE EFFECT.

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TO FUND MUSLIM FOOTBATHS

Debbie Schlussel is reporting that the University of Michigan will set up two footbath locations on the Dearborn campus this fall for Muslim students. These footbaths will be funded by tax dollars despite that whole separation of church and state thing. Oh, that's right...that's separation of Christian church and state. My bad.

FRED THOMPSON JUMPING IN TO PRESIDENTIAL RACE

It looks like Fred Thompson will officially jump into the Presidential Race for the Republican nomination over the 4th of July holiday. I know this news is making many conservatives happy including myself. We want an appealing alternative to the current crop and are hoping to make Fred Thompson a viable, top tier candidate. It is especially encouraging considering Newt Gingrich's latest disappointing statements.

THE FAUXTOGRAPHY FOOLS

The Jawa Report (via Ace of Spades) has some of the latest examples of fauxtography brewed in Gaza. Case one: missile with square looking pixel framing in closeup. Case two: a man running with a seemingly injured boy in his arms who looks more like he's playing along and whose other pals, notably the boy to the right, has a hand that doesn't seem quite there. Case three: how exactly do the reporters happen to be on the scene at the right moment? Something just doesn't smell right about all this.

Large-scale deportation of illegals IS possible

Some history you may not know about


Operation Wetback was a 1954 project of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to remove about 1.2 million illegal immigrants from the southwestern United States, with a focus on Mexican nationals.

Burgeoning numbers of illegal aliens prompted President Dwight D. Eisenhower to appoint his longtime friend, General Joseph Swing, as INS Commissioner. According to Attorney General Herbert Brownell Jr., Eisenhower had a sense of urgency about illegal immigration immediately upon taking office. In a letter to Sen. William Fulbright, Eisenhower quoted a report in The New York Times that said: "The rise in illegal border-crossing by Mexican 'wetbacks' to a current rate of more than 1,000,000 cases a year has been accompanied by a curious relaxation in ethical standards extending all the way from the farmer-exploiters of this contraband labor to the highest levels of the Federal Government."

Eisenhower became increasingly concerned that profits from illegal labor led to corruption. An on-and-off guest-worker program for Mexicans was operating at the time, and farmers and ranchers in the Southwest were becoming dependent on additional low-cost labor. The operation was modeled after the deportation program that invited American citizens of Mexican ancestry to go back to Mexico during the Great Depression because of the bad economy north of the border. See Mexican Repatriation.

The operation began in California and Arizona and coordinated 1,075 Border Patrol agents along with state and local police agencies to mount an aggressive crackdown, going as far as police sweeps of Mexican-American neighborhoods and random stops and ID checks of "Mexican-looking" people in a region with many Native Americans and native Hispanics[citation needed]. Some 750 agents targeted agricultural areas with a goal of 1000 apprehensions a day. By the end of July, over 50,000 aliens were caught in the two states. Around 488,000 people fled the country for fear of being apprehended. By September, 80,000 had been taken into custody in Texas, and the INS estimates that 500,000-700,000 illegals had left Texas voluntarily. To discourage re-entry, buses and trains took many illegals deep within Mexico before being set free. Tens of thousands more were put aboard two hired ships, the Emancipation and the Mercurio. The ships ferried the aliens from Port Isabel, Texas, to Veracruz, Mexico, more than 500 miles (900 kilometers) south.

Operation Wetback deported approximately 80,000 Mexican nationals in the space of almost a year, although local INS officials claimed that an additional 500,000-700,000 had fled to Mexico before the campaign began. The INS estimates rested on the claim that most undocumented people, fearing apprehension by the government, had voluntarily repatriated themselves before and during the operation.

Source


(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)

Must not Mention that Some Blacks were Cannibals

Particularly if you use an actual black name to add realism:

"A Canadian organization that promotes multiculturalism is filing a complaint with the federal human rights commission over an animated Internet video depicting an African cannibal dubbed Kunta Kinte who is seen cooking a stew whose main ingredient is two white people.

The race-relations group Quebec Pluriel served legal notice April 18 to the company that made the cartoon, Salambo Productions, and the show's broadcast partner Bell Canada, to stop showing the video and apologize.

Since Salambo refused to remove the show from the Web site and apologize, Quebec Pluriel said Thursday that it intends to file a complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

Source

Some people might get the absurd idea that whites had a civilizing influence. Everybody should be free to eat what they want! As long as it does not make them fat, of course.

(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)

OZ AND THE UK ARE COLDER THAN NORMAL

TIM BLAIR REPORTS THAT THE UK AND OZ ARE COLDER THAN NORMAL SO FAR THIS SUMMER. (I ADD THAT APRIL IN NYC WAS ONE OF THE COOLEST ON RECORD.)

WILL THIS DETER THE AGW CROWD - THE ECO-NUTSIES - FROM SCREAMING THAT WE HAVE ONLY 5 YEARS TO SAVE THE PLANET BY (SURPRISE SURPRISE) RAISING TAXES AND INCREASING REGULATIONS?

NOPE.

That's because there's a difference between weather and climate.
When it gets colder, it's weather.

Only when it gets warmer is it the climate.
And fire never melts steel. And Bush lied. And Gore won. And there's no al Qaeda in Iraq. And it's the Israel Lobby's fault. And federal deficits are out of control.

Heh.

NYTIMES DEMOLISHES LOU DOBBS

RTWT.

(I WISH THEY DID THIS AMOUNT OF CRITICAL RESEARCH AND HARSH ANALYSIS OF THE TRUTHER CLAIMS AND THE PLAME CASE. THEY'RE EVEN MORE BOGUS.)

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

IT'S TIME FOR OLMERT TO EXPLAIN HIMSELF

The time for Olmert to face the Knesset and explain his refusal to resign is drawing near:
(IsraelNN.com) Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will be forced to stand before the Knesset Tuesday afternoon and explain his response to the Winograd Committee's interim report in a session entitled, "The Prime Minister's Refusal to Surrender his Position Following the Winograd Report."

PM Olmert has, until now, avoided offering an explanation to the Knesset, where outbursts and recriminations are a part of most addresses.

Forty MKs signed a petition forcing Olmert to answer questions regarding his decision to stay in power following the damning report.
I wonder if he'll be stuttering as he appears before them? But he certainly does have a lot explaining to do.

DID ADAM GADAHN CONFIRM THAT MUSLIMS CONSIDER THE VIRGINIA TECH MASSACRE A JIHADI ATTACK?

I think so. What do you think? Remember, the perpetrator of the massacre dubbed himself Ismail Axe (Islamic spelling of the name Ishmael).

CAIRO, Egypt — An American member of Al Qaeda warned President Bush on Tuesday to end U.S. involvement in all Muslim lands or face an attack worse than the Sept. 11 suicide assault, according to a new videotape.

Wearing a white robe and a turban, Adam Yehiye Gadahn, who also goes by the name Azzam al-Amriki, said Al Qaeda would not negotiate on its demands.

"Your failure to heed our demands ... means that you and your people will ... experience things which will make you forget all about the horrors of September 11th, Afghanistan and Iraq and Virginia Tech," he said in the seven-minute video.

Reliapundit adds: Maybe - it is among a list of exclusively Muslim acts of violence. At the very least he seems to be holding it up as an example of the type of terror he desires to inflict on us - a terror more terrifying than VT. I also want to point out to the Truthers that this quote is another instance of al Qaeda taking credit for 9/11. And I want to remind all the fence-saitters that we are fighting people who admire 9/11 and these kinds of things: beheadings of journalists and aid workers; the destruction of mosques; the stoning of women and "honor-killings." Nazis were kinder and gentler than these guys.


Pastorius adds
:
And, also note that Gadahn confirms that the results of the Pew poll indicate that, no matter what CAIR might say, American Muslims back Al Qaeda and the cause of Jihad in a manner which ought to alarm us all (transcribed from the video):
As confirmed by a new poll of Muslims in four major regional countries, conducted by the Center for International and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, Muslims continue to support and defend the goals, efforts and sacrifices of their brothers and sisters, the Mujahadin, and continue to demonstrate broad awarenes of the evil nature of America, and the threat posed by it.
Yes, yes, it's only a tiny minority of people who want to live in the dark ages. Pay no attention to the maniacal prophet behind the curtain.

UPDATED AND BUMPED: AT LEAST THE SOCIALIST BLAIR UNDERSTANDS WW4 - but is it too late?

BUMPED

TONY BLAIR:
I was stopped by someone the other week who said it was not surprising there was so much terrorism in the world when we invaded their countries (meaning Afghanistan and Iraq). No wonder Muslims felt angry.

When he had finished, I said to him: tell me exactly what they feel angry about. We remove two utterly brutal and dictatorial regimes; we replace them with a United Nations-supervised democratic process and the Muslims in both countries get the chance to vote, which incidentally they take in very large numbers. And the only reason it is difficult still is because other Muslims are using terrorism to try to destroy the fledgling democracy and, in doing so, are killing fellow Muslims.

What’s more, British troops are risking their lives trying to prevent the killing. Why should anyone feel angry about us? Why aren’t they angry about the people doing the killing? The odd thing about the conversation is that I could tell it was the first time he had even heard the alternative argument.

This extremism can be defeated. But it will be defeated only by recognising that we have not created it; it cannot be negotiated with; pandering to its sense of grievance will only encourage it; and only by confronting it, the methods and the ideas, will we win.
YES. AND WE NEED TO CONFRONT IT ON EVERY FRONT: DIPLOMATIC; ECONOMIC, AND KINETIC.

THE SOONER THE LEFT ACCEPTS THIS THE SOONER WE WIN, AND THE LOWER THE CASUALTIES.

BUT THAT'S NOT LIKELY ANYTIME SOON:
THE DEMOCRATS ARE DOMINATED BY DENIALISTS, APPEASERS AND "ANTI-WAR" DOVES WHO HAVE ALWAYS BLAMED AMERICA FIRST.

AND THE UK'S LABOUR PARTY, AND THE REST OF THE CHIC DEGEGERATI OF THE CONTINENT'S POSTMODERN LEFT BLAME THE US, ISRAEL AND JUDEO-CHRISTIAN/RACIST-WESTERN CIVILIZATION.

BLAIR IS THE EXCEPTION ON THE LEFT. ALONG WITH LIEBERMAN.
BTW: I HAVE LONG WORRIED ABOUT WHAT MIGHT HAVE TO HAPPEN HERE TO GET THE LEFT BACK ON OUR SIDE FOR KEEPS.

I THINK IT'S GONNA MAKE 9/11 LOOK LIKE A PICNIC. AND IT MAY BE COMING SOON - AT LEAST THAT'S WHAT AL QAEDA IS THREATENING.

Update: LGF has the video --- Jihad Watch has some analysis. SITE (hat tip JW) has this:
The demands are emphatically stated by Gadahn [Azzam al Amriki] to not be construed as negotiations, for Muslims do not negotiate with “baby killers and war criminals”. These entail the removal of American military forces from Muslim lands, cease of encroachment into the political, social, and economic affairs in these countries, and to free Muslim captives from prisons.

Should these demands not be met, Gadahn states, “means that you and your people will- Allah willing- experience things which will make you forget all about the horrors of September 11th, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Virginia Tech.” Withdrawing from Iraq alone, Gadahn states, does not qualify as acceptance of terms, and he mockingly advices for Bush to stop his “futile farcical maneuvers on Capital Hill.”
LOOKIT FOLKS: This tape is a traditional Koranic WARNING required before they undertake a MAJOR attack which will kill thousands at the least.

Bin Laden was sharply criticized by jihado-mullahs/imams for NOT WARNING the USA before 9/11, and this tape EXPLICITLY does warn us over and over. he uses the term "SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION" many times. This is the whole point of the tape, and it is made in English by an American so that there is absolutely no way anybody here in the USA can say we weren't warned.

This tape makes ANY attack - any MEGA attack using any WMD, including radiological/nuclear- OK as far as the islamo-fascists are concerned.

ASIDE: AND NOTE THIS ERROR AZZAM AL AMRIKI MADE IN THE TAPE: He called the USA's support fore Israel "moral support." He did not say it was IMMORAL support. This is a Freudian slip: deep down he knows that he and his ilk are on the side of immorality, and that the USA and Israel are on the side of all which is moral, just, good and right.

CREATION MUSEUM

Answers in Genesis opened their Creation Museum yesterday. I am very excited and proud of this project. My parents have made special vacation plans to go see it this summer.

What never ceases to amaze me is how controversial it has already become. All the familiar arguments are thrown out against those of us "naive idiots" who believe in Creationism instead of Evolution. If you don't believe in evolution you are a considered by the elite to be an uneducated minority who is anti-science. The school board members in Kansas that wanted Intelligent Design to at least be offered as an alternative theory to Evolution were ridiculed as being anti-science kooks. If you take the time to study you'll find that science backs up Creationism a lot more than it does Evolution.

In my high school debate class I was involved in a debate on whether Evolution was true or not. My friend freaked out when she found out we were on the side against Evolution. She was convinced that the evidence was overwhelmingly for evolution and we were sure to lose. I just smiled. I did a ton of research and we came prepared and kicked their butts and won the debate hands down!!! To be honest, it is one of my favorite memories of high school. We never sought to prove Creation, only to disprove Evolution.

Evolution has A LOT of holes in it and their is ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF of evolution and yet it is taught in every single public school today. Both Evolution and Creationism are theories that can't be proven because no one can go back in time and watch the beginning of the world taking place. People talk about how Creationism involves faith but it takes a lot more faith to believe in evolution over creation. To this day there has never, ever been a transitional form found to prove that Evolution takes place. Yet, it is taught as FACT in all public schools.

When you consider how Intelligent Design can't even be taught as an alternative theory to Evolution in schools it amazes me that Evolutionists can't even stand the thought of this museum. How dare someone plant the idea that Evolution might not be true? My belief is that Evolutionists wouldn't be so threatened if they really believed their theory was true.


Contrary to popular belief there are a lot of scientists (scroll down on the link to see the list) that don't believe in Evolution and do believe in Creationism. For those of you who insist that Evolution has to be true because all the "experts" say so and its what you've always been taught take the time to check out what organizations like Answers in Genesis have to say. To start, read this article, Can Creationists be Scientists?

I know many will disagree and be 100% convinced that I am an anti-science kook for believing in Creationism. Thats okay, but take the time to study the other side. Evolution is one of those "politically correct" issues that has been rammed down our throats with no alternative allowed. If Evolution is so fool-proof why do so many want to silence the other side?

BILL RICHARDSON SHAMES FALLEN MARINE

Remember a while back how I said New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson is the only serious Democrat Party candidate for president?

Well, NEVERMIND.

THE THAWING OF DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH IRAN?

Charles, at Little Green Footballs, seems to think George Bush has gone off the rails with regard to the Iraq war and our relationship with Iran. I agree. I think we have been seeing hints of this for quite some time:


The Bush administration is perilously close to jumping the tracks. I’ve
supported the President through the long course of the war that began on
September 11, but it’s starting to look like he’s simply getting tired; he won’t
defend his administration against attacks, he won’t defend the country against
illegal immigration, he won’t do anything to stop the media leaks that cripple
our national security ... and now this:
U.S., Iran end 27-year diplomatic freeze.


The Bush Administration in the past have blamed Iran for directly training the forces who kill our troops in Iraq. They have also blamed Iran for bunding Hizballah and Hamas. They have also targeted Iran for it's threats against the state of Israel, and for its complicity with the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad who was under investigation for the assassination of the Leganese President. Now, we're ending our 27-year long diplomatic freeze?

If this isn't some sort of Corleonesque trick (Keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer"), then George Bush's legacy may end up being worse than that of Jimmy Carter.

UPDATE: Looks like Newt Gingrich agrees with me.

Christian Teaching Banned; Wiccans OK

Edinburgh University in Scotland has a history of Leftist nuttery -- and declining academic standards:

"Some would call it the Devil's work. Two ancient religions have locked horns in a bizarre "freedom of speech" row that is echoing around the corridors of one of Scotland's oldest academic institutions. The University of Edinburgh has granted permission to the Pagan Society to hold its annual conference - involving talks on witchcraft, pagan weddings and tribal dancing - on campus next month. Druids, heathens, shamans and witches are expected to attend what is a major event in the pagan calendar.

But the move has enraged the Christian Union, which accuses the university of double standards after banning one of its events on the "dangers" of homosexuality. Matthew Tindale, an Edinburgh-based Christian Union staff worker, claimed some faiths and beliefs appeared to be more equal than others on campus. "This seems to be a clear case of discrimination," he said. "It's okay for other religions, such as the pagans, to have their say at the university, but there appears to be a reluctance to allow Christians to do the same. All we are asking for is the tolerance that is afforded to other faiths and organisations."

The Union has won strong backing from the Catholic Church in Scotland, whose spokesman, Simon Dames, felt that allowing the pagan festival to go ahead while barring the Union meeting was an example of "Christianphobia". "This appears to be a clear case of double standards," he said. "The principles of a pluralistic democracy revolve around an acceptance of competing ideas and universities should be enshrining this principle. Anti-racism groups would never be asked to put up posters saying there are alternative views."

The row has its roots in last year's decision by university officials to ban the Christian Union from using campus premises to run a course which claimed that gay sex was morally wrong. The course was deemed to be in breach of university anti-discrimination guidelines although a compromise measure was later offered to allow the course to take place if posters offering differing views were prominently displayed. Much to the displeasure of some campus Christians and the Catholic Church, no such conditions will be attached to the pagan gathering.

Source


(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)

Leftist wants someone to loathe

Australian Leftist columnist Phillip Adams often writes in a rather ironic way but the article by him excerpted below does seem to be a clear confession of the hate that drives him -- as it does with so many Leftists. That they hail the slightest negativity emanating from conservatvies as "hate" shows how urgent is their need to project their own failings onto others. Adams is commenting on the likely defeat of Australia's conservative government at the next election -- due later this year. Adams is a millionaire so his hate is not born of "poverty". And, yes, that poster he has on his library wall is who you think it is



For God’s sake don’t tell Christopher Hitchens or Richard Dawkins, but despite a lifetime’s atheism I have, over the past decade, been driven to prayer. My increasingly desperate appeals have been addressed to Jehovah, Yahweh, Allah, Thor, Ra, Vulcan and sundry totems, jujus, graven images and idols - entreating one or more of them to end the Howard Government....

But nothing happened. To be perfectly frank the disappointing lack of response considerably added to my religious scepticism. But now, suddenly, the gods are acting! The various almighties are finally showing him the door! And I’m suddenly getting a bit worried. How will I get on without him? .... Just as Mum needed Kennett to give meaning to her existence, I may well be sustained by Howard hating. How will I get through the day without the prospect of the six o’clock news when I can, in the family tradition, yell at the screen?

The world faces a similar problem with George W. Bush. The most unpopular president since Harry Truman at his nadir - and as Jimmy Carter rightly says “the worst president in US history” - will soon be banished from the political stage. For nigh on seven years - though it seems almost an eternity - countless millions have loathed the man. He has increased the blood pressure of not only hapless Democrats but also a large majority of my fellow Australians and pretty much the entire population of Europe.... Where will all that hatred go when he’s gone? What will people do with it?

For 11 years John Winston Howard has been my central focus, my obsession, my bogeyman, my nemesis. To be without him might answer those prayers. But as has been wisely said “Beware the answered prayer”!


More here

(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)

BOB FELLER, AMERICAN HERO

BUMPED

Thanks to a link from Kathryn Lopez, I saw on the Bluey Blog that Bob Feller participated in today's Memorial Day Parade in Washington, D.C.

Bob Feller, the "Heater from Van Meter," was a childhood hero of mine. He was one of the Cleveland Indians' greatest pitchers, a key man in the rotation in 1954, along with greats Early Wynn, Bob Lemon, when the Tribe won 111 games -- 8 more than the Yankees had, in what turned out to be Casey Stengel's winningest year.

But clicking through to the Bob Feller museum's website, where a handy summary sheet of "Rapid Robert's" statistics is displayed, I noticed the following entry:
1942-43-44 In Military Service.
Bob Feller, the greatest pitcher of his time, enlisted in the Navy shortly after Pearl Harbor, and served as a gun crew chief on the U.S.S. Alabama (BB-60), a 35,000 ton South-Dakota-class battleship. While aboard, he earned 5 campaign ribbons and 8 battle stars during patrols that took the Alabama from island to island, all the way to Japan.

Feller's patriotism was not exceptional in his day, but it is no less admirable because of that. A pitcher's career is limited by time, and at the height of his powers, he accepted hazardous combat duty instead. Even though President Roosevelt had offered deferments to all Major League ballplayers.

America is the land of the free, because it is the home of the brave. We will always need men like Bob Feller, on and off the field, during times of peace and times of war.

CHAVEZ MOVES TO "NATIONALIZE" ANOTHER TV STATION

ANOTHER BLOW AGAINST FREE SPEECH. WHY? BECAUSE IT WAS CRITICAL OF HIM AND HIS POLICIES.

I GUESS HE FELT HE HAD TO IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE "REVOLUTION" - SOCIALISTS ALWAYS DO.

THIS IS A REAL ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH. WHY IS THE USA LEFT SILENT?

BECAUSE THEY EXCUSE ANYTHING DONE BY A SOCIALIST.

EXCEPT - AS BLAIR PROVES - IF THEY ALLY THEMSELVES WITH BUSH.

YA KNOW, IF DUBYA HADN'T CUT TAXES HE'D BE REGARDED AS THE BEST L-I-B-E-R-A-L PRESIDENT SINCE LBJ!

HUMAN VACCINE FOR BIRD FLU?

PROMISING NEWS FROM THE BBC.

Monday, May 28, 2007

PREDICTION: PELOSI'S BUDDY ASSAD WILL ONCE AGAIN WIN MORE THAN 97% OF THE "VOTE"

THE PENINSULA (QATAR):
Turnout in Syria’s referendum to endorse a second term in office for President Bashar Al Assad was unprecedented, the nation’s interior minister said before results were announced yesterday.

“The Syrian people spoke out yesterday. Participation in the referendum was enormous, never before seen in the country’s history,” Bassam Abdel Majid said in remarks carried by the press.

He gave no figures but his ministry is due to announce the results of Sunday’s vote at a press conference. Assad, who first took power in 2000 on the death of his father Hafez Al Assad, was standing unchallenged in the referendum, which was boycotted by the opposition and followed a crackdown on political dissidents.

In the last referendum, Assad won 97.29 per cent of the vote, according to official figures.
MORE:
The results of Syria's presidential referendum due to be released on Monday will instead be made public on Tuesday, Syrian interior minister Bassam Abd al-Majid has announced. He gave no reason for the delay in the results of the vote which featured a single candidate, current Syrian president Basher al-Assad. Polls on Sunday opened three hours after they were initially scheduled to do so because of what al-Majd said was "an exhuberant turnout of citizens wanting to cast their ballots".

Voters were called to either vote "yes" or a "no" for al-Assad who was nominated as the sole candidate by the Syrian parliament which is dominated by the ruling Baath Party and its allies.

Opposition groups boycotted the election alleging that it would be rigged in the president's favour.
NOW I KNOW WHY PELOSI ADMIRES ASSAD: SHE WANTS THAT KIND OF "ELECTORAL" VICTORY FOR THE DEMS!

AFTER SHE ENACTS A CHAVEZ-LIKE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE (SEE BELOW) SHE THINKS SHE'LL GET IT, TOO.

SARKOZY MOST POPULAR PREZ SINCE dE GAULLE

65%.

HE'LL NEED THIS GOOD WILL TO GET A WORKABLE MAJORITY IN THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY.

AND FOR WHEN THE GOING GETS TOUGH: WHEN THE STUDENTS, SLACKERS AND UNIONISTS GO ON STRIKE AND THEN TAKE TO THE STREETS, VIOLENTLY .

(ER UM.... AROUND CHRISTMAS TIME - IF SARLKOZY PLAYS HIS HANDS THE WAY I THINK HE WILL.)

Meanwhile... Royal and the Left sucks up to the Muslims. (The socialist parties of Europe NEED the Muslim vote - see HERE and HERE and HERE. And the Muslims know this. BIRDS OF A FEATHER!)

MARK LEVIN: "CHAVEZ IMPLEMENTS FAIRNESS DOCTRINE"

Lubos Motl Looks At Sun Spots

Lubos sent me an e-mail thanking me for Clouds In Chambers and suggesting I have a look at Sunspots. He shows the correlations between sunspots and global temperatures.

Cross Posted at Power and Control and at Classical Values

IEC Fusion for Dummies



A short video that schematically shows how a Bussard Fusion Reactor works. The video was done by Foger Rox.


A short technical explanation can be found at Bussard Fusion Reactor. A more detailed look with social implications can be found at Easy Low Cost No Radiation Fusion.

Cross Posted at Classical Values

NATIONAL RELIGIOUS LEADERS LAUNCH SOLIDARITY CAMPAIGN FOR SDEROT

A solidarity and support project now taking place for Sderot:
Last week, on the eve of Shavuot, a group of National Religious leaders convened a meeting in the bomb shelter of Sderot's hesder yeshiva to launch what they promised would be a nationwide campaign to support the beleaguered townspeople and to reclaim what they described as Israel's lost self-respect.

It appeared to be a last-minute affair in which flyers announcing the meeting were distributed haphazardly in downtown Sderot only an hour or two before the meeting was scheduled to begin. Perhaps as a result, virtually no one from the town showed up.

But some of the key rabbis in the religious Zionist movement were on hand, including former MK Rabbi Hanan Porat, former MK Rabbi Haim Drukman and the former rabbi of Gush Katif, Yigal Kaminetzky.

Although the subject of the meeting was Sderot, the searing memories of the withdrawal from the Gaza Strip were clearly present in the speakers' minds.

Porat, who has established a group called "Raising the Flag for Sderot," charged that by not taking effective measures against the Gaza terrorist groups that were firing Kassams at Sderot and the western Negev communities, the government was "desecrating God."

"It is our job," Porat declared, "to arouse the nation so that this disgrace will not continue. We must lead the nation into standing erect. We should not be afraid of talking about Jewishness and nationalism."

Kaminetzky charged that in its alleged failure to protect Sderot, the government was once again proving that "it has disengaged from the value of joint responsibility. Disengagement from our Jewish roots brings about disengagement from responsibility."

He declared that the terrorist attacks in Sderot and the surrounding communities were not the problem of the residents alone but everyone's problem. Like Porat, the former Gush Katif rabbi declared that it was a desecration of God to allow the terrorists to "shoot at Jews without responding."
They're right, it's everyone's problem, since it could happen in other places just as easily.

MEMORIAL DAY TRIBUTE

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.--Ronald Reagan

THE DEMOCRATS, THE LEFT, THE LINCOLN BRIGADES AND IRAQ

bumped

The penultimate line of the last verse of The Battle Hymn of the Republic - (written by Howe, pictured at left) - is:

" let us die to make men free, ...
- this is a noble cause, one history proves our armed forces have long been devoted too.

The men and women of the US armed forces have died to make men free in war after war, time after time - for centuries, securing our liberty and those of millions and MILLIONS of people all over the world.


We pay our respects to them all on this National Holiday. It is altogether fitting and proper that we do so. In fact, it is the least that we can do.

Our armed forces are once again deployed in war zones defending liberty.

Our troops are currently in Iraq pursuant to a request of the DEMOCRATICALLY elected Parliament
of the constitutional government of the Republic of Iraq, AND a UN Security Resolution requiring we provide security as the legally recognized occupying force.



We are fighting factions which don't want that nascent democracy to survive.


If we leave too soon - before the democratic Iraqi government can defend itself, then this nascent democracy will die and be replaced by one or more tyrannical states inimical to the USA and the Free World. They will be allies of Iran and al Qaeda and enemies of democracy and freedom.


That is not in our national interest; it is not in the interest of the Free World, and it makes us and our children and our children's children less safe.

Nevertheless, every single solitary Democrat candidate for the presidency and the entire leadership of the Democrats in Congress are either pushing for a withdrawal of US forces by a date certain or regardless of how well the nascent democracy of Iraq is doing or whether they are in a position to defend themselves.

The utter moral bankruptcy of these positions is proven by the fact that they push HARDEST for withdrawal if Iraq is NOT meeting benchmarks. Well, if they're not meeting benchmarks then that's EXACTLY when they need us most of all. That is not the time dependable, trustworthy allies abandon a fight. But it's EXACTLY what the Democrats want. They have no shame.

The Democrats have staked out this shameless, defeatist position because they are once again the party of the Left, a party run by McGovernites - the doves who think it's okay to end a war by retreating, surrendering.

In the case of Iraq, these Democrats and their Democrat Party are willing to surrender it to Iran and al Qaeda.




There was once a time when people who self-identified themselves as Leftists VOLUNTEERED to fight on foreign soil in defense of a nascent democracy and against fascism.

The time was 1936; the nation was Spain, and those who went had to join the International brigades because FDR kept the USA officially on the sidelines.



[ASIDE: FDR did this and also set up concentration camps for US CITIZENS of Japanese heritage, and yet the Left - TO THIS DAY - idolizes him. GO FIGURE!]


I asked some old-time Lefties, who had friends in the Lincoln Brigades, (the international brigades for US citizens), if they thought FDR was wrong to stay on the sidelines, and if their friends were right and good and noble to go to Spain to fight fascism.

They answered that they felt that FDR was wrong and their friends were right, good and noble.

SO..... then I asked them... why they NOW feel that our continued efforts in Iraq are wrong, bad and ignoble!?


Why do they feel that Bush should put the USA military on the sidelines of this fight and let the ISLAMO-FASCISTS - WHO ARE MUCH WORSE THAN FRANCO EVER WAS - take over Iraq, home of 20% of the world's oil!?!?


I'm still waiting for a good answer.


I'm afraid that the REAL answer is that FDR was a socialist, so whatever else he did which was bad - like staying on the sidelines during Spain's Civil War - is forgiven, even though they think that intervention to stop fascism was right.

Because "Bush cut taxes on the rich" he must therefore be opposed NO MATTER WHAT ELSE HE DOES.



This figures: the Left has ALWAYS excused the crimes of socialists and socialism.


And they have always put socialism ahead of liberty.


This figures too: collectivism is intrinsically opposed to personal liberty.


The ONLY way the West can lose in Iraq - and to islamo-fascists anywhere - is if the Left gets control of the USG.


Iran and Al Qaeda are counting on this. These enemies are dying and killing to make men and women subservient to them and their totalitarian islamo-fascist ideologies.

We must not let them win. To defeat the islamo-fascists we must defeat the Left and the Democrat Party they control.

The stakes are high. In Iraq and the Middle East now, and throughout the world for generations to come.

We have been up to this challenge in the past. We have met this type of challenge in the past and won. We can win again.

We must be willing to die to make others free. And to protect our freedom. As so many members of the US armed forces have - from 1776 on these very shores, too 2007 in Mesopotamia.

I pray there is never a time or a place that the USA will not go the full distance in order to secure our liberty and the liberty of people everywhere who yearn to be free.

We should especially remember this on Memorial Day.

God Bless Our Troops.

The latest from Britain's "National Health"

Private medical treatment saves British woman

Under NHS rules she would have died

Sarah Burnell was 43 when breast cancer was diagnosed in November 2005. Despite having had the all-clear after a mammogram a year earlier, she had developed 11 tumours and had to have a mastectomy and chemotherapy. Because of a family history of breast cancer – her mother had the diagnosis at 51 – she had insisted on annual mammograms from the age of 38. They probably saved her life.

Her mother had been perimenopausal when her diagnosis was made, Ms Burnell, a radiologist, said, so she would not have been screened by the NHS until she was 46. “It was only because of my work as a radiologist that I was able to get screening before this age,” she said. “This meant that I caught the cancer early, before it had a chance to spread to my lymph nodes.”

A colleague at the private Princess Grace Hospital in Central London did the mammogram, and showed Ms Burnell the results. “I only saw the largest tumour. It was only when I went for ultrasound that I found out I had 11 tumours,” she said. “Thankfully, they were all very small.”

Ms Burnell, of Battersea, had a mastectomy, reconstructive surgery and chemotherapy. A year later her aunt, 70, was told that cancer was present in both breasts, indicating an even stronger genetic link.

Ms Burnell’s daughter, Xanthe, 9, is now worried that she will develop the disease and wants to have genetic testing. “Xanthe is concerned, but we are glad at this breakthrough in research,” Ms Burnell said. “We hope it will help her decide when to start screening. If she has the gene, I think she should start being screened at the age of 25. “I would hate her to go through what I went through. It’s been a very tough time.”

Source






NHS dentistry: Splendid British bureaucratic logic at work

They only treat you if you have GOOD teeth! Don't you love it?

DENTISTS on the National Health Service are turning away people with bad teeth because they say they are only paid enough to treat patients with a good dental health record. One surgery admitted that people who have not had a dental appointment for three years will be refused treatment. Others are employing more subtle methods to reject patients.

Dentists' leaders say the NHS dental contract, introduced in April last year, has had a perverse effect because dentists earn the same for giving a patient one filling or 10. The Oakwood Dental Centre in Derby, for instance, says on Derby City Primary Care Trust's website that it "will only accept patients who have visited a dental surgery within the last three years". Aneu Sood, who runs the practice, said it had no time to treat those who "need a tremendous amount of work".

According to dentists' leaders, potentially unprofitable patients are screened out by giving preference to those patients who have recently been dropped by an NHS practice which has gone private. This sort of patient is likely to have had recent and regular treatment and therefore is unlikely to need extensive new surgery. Dentists will also take on the relatives of existing patients with healthy teeth in the expectation that family members will need little treatment as well.

Source

(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)