THE "RECRUITING POWER" OF HITLER AND NAZISM, AND THE BRUTALITY OF FDR - or what Sheba Farms and the Sudatenland have in common

POWERLINE relates a few incredible idiotic comments by the UN's #2 Mark Malloch Brown (a longtime Korrupt Kofi's Kronie):

"Everybody would want a solution here which takes away the recruiting power of Hizbollah in the broader Arab world. That is one which addresses the territorial issue of the Sheba farms, which in a broader way addresses Lebanon’s sovereignty and integrity in a way that allows Hizbollah a political as against a militia future inside an independent Lebanon. If those issues can be addressed, then the support for a militarised Hizbollah falls away."

[POWERLINE]: This is utterly delusional. The idea that Hezbollah's maniacal attempt to exterminate the Jews somehow turns on Sheba Farms, a tiny slice of land adjoining the Golan Heights, which the U.N. says belongs to Syria, not Lebanon, is absurd on its face. And Brown's reference to Lebanon's "sovereignty and integrity," in the present context, is mystifying, since Israel departed Lebanon six years ago, and the only threat to Lebanon's sovereignty and integrity since that time has come from Hezbollah's patron, Syria, and from Hezbollah itself. But Brown, like most diplomats, is unable to understand or acknowledge that Islamic terrorists are simply evil. He desperately wants the present conflict to be about land. If we can only give Hezbollah some land--any land!--somehow, sanity will be restored. Suffice it to say that this is an approach that has been tried, and found wanting.

Giving Hitler the Sudatenland didn't mollify him; it emboldened him - even as 1938's MSM cheered Chamberlain as a "PEACEMAKER!" --- HISTORY HAS PROVEN THIS WHOLE EPISODE WAS IDIOTIC. Had Hitler been brutally attacked at that time - and his forces forced to retreat away from his border with the Sudatenland - then WW2 might have been avoided. Which is exactly what Churchill said at the time - and the MSM called HIM a warmongerer.

Chamberlain chose diplomacy and appeasement with evil rather than accept the fact that evil - like Hitler and Nazism - must be DESTROYED and not appeased. So, we failed to stop Hitler early and we got WW2. And WW2 was brutal. And we fought it with both hands and a cold heart. We didn't worry about anything except WINNING.

When we fire-bombed Dresden we did not improve Hitler's recruiting - and frankly, the idea is ridiculous them as it is now.

We ended his recruiting altogether when we blew up his bunker, killing him and his evil comrades. That's how you defeat an enemy. And end their recruiting.

Hiroshima did not increase the number of kamikazes attacking us. And proof that Hiroshima was NECESSARY (and that a "demonstration" in the Pacific would have been a collossal waste), is the fact that Japan didn't surrender until more than a week later, AFTER WE DROPPED A SECOND A-BOMB ON NAGASAKI. It took two.

FDR and Truman and Churchill knew what it took to defeat a ruthless evil enemy.

Bush and Olmert are dovish PANSIES compared to FDR and Truman. And that's why the GWOT is dragging on - in Iraq and Afghanistan and Israel. We should have NUKED Torabora, and assassinated Saddam and Moki alSadr. We should assasinate Assad - instead of going therough the motions of a UN investigation. We should have assassinated Nasrallah in 1983, when he ordered his evil Hizb'Allah operatives to bomb our Marine barracks killing a few hundred Marines - (Reagan blew this, BIGTIME). And. we should have wiped out the jihadomaniacs in Somalia and Yemen during the Clinton adminsitration.

When you fight with one hand behind your back and worry about reactions in the MSM, THAT'S when you aid the enemy. Giving into Ahmadinejad and Assad and Nasrallah now would only embolden them. They must be destroyed and not appeased.

The IDF should have begun their massive ground sweep through southern Lebanon - annihilating any and all Hizb'Allah forces and caches - A WEEK AGO. They did't because they value appearance to much and smashing the enemy brutally too little.

Dresden, and Hiroshima were important and useful counter-attacks during WW2. They are part of why we won. We did not hold back. We aimed to destroy the enemy and we used everything we had in order to do just that.

We need to ruthlessly destroy the jihdomaniacs - everywhere - if we want to win the GWOT. And compassionate Bush and moderate Olmert seem incapable of being as ruthless as FDR and Truman or Churchill. The result emboldens the enemy and endangers us all.

The enemy chose war; they attacked us. To achieve peace, we must wipe them off the face of the Earth. Nasrallah, Binladen, Assad and Ahmadinejad should all be assassinated. And if it takes very big bombs to do it, then so be it.

Do I sound UNHINGED? Sure: as unhinged as FDR and Truman.

THE LEFT/MSM WANTS "AN END TO VIOLENCE" - AND NOT VICTORY

TONY SNOW HELD A WH PRESSER TODAY. THE FIRST QUESTION WAS:

"WHEN WILL THERE BE AN END TO VIOLENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST?"

NOT "WHEN WILL OUR ALLIES DEFEAT HIZB'ALLAH?" REMEMBER: HIZB'ALLAH IS THE VERY SAME GROUP LED BY THE VERY SAME MAN WHO MURDERED 241 OF OUR MARINES IN 1983.

I'M UNHAPPY WITH THE CONTINUING VIOLENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST. THERE'S ONLY ONE REAL WAY TO END IT: IT WON'T END UNTIL WE DEFEAT OUR ENEMIES.

NOTE: I think it's very revealing that Bush's Leftist critics in the USA and Europe ALL agree with Binladen, Ahmadinejad and Nasrallah when it comes to Israel. IOW: The "Blame America First" crowd is the same as the "ALWAYS BLAME ISRAEL" crowd. Innerestin. I think it proves that the Left is thoroughly anti-West/anti-Judeo-Christian - as their post-modernist ideology demands. And this is why it doesn't even realy occur to them that Israel and the USA should annihilate Hizb'Allah; they like Hizb'Allah, and see it as a brash if not brave group of natives fighting a depraved civilization. And they aid an abet our enemies everyday - and frame the debate and ask the questions in ways that undermine our counter-attack agaiunt Global Jihad.

Which is why I always say: To defeat the Jihadomaniacs we have to defeat the Left.

KNOW YOUR ENEMY: A POINT-BY-POINT COMPARISON OF HIZB'ALLAH AND ISRAEL

FROM WIZBANG. RTWT.

COWARDLY HIZB'ALLAH JIHADOMANIACS ARE CAPTURED ALIVE BY IDF

I GUESS ALL THE LAUNDRYHEADS DON'T REALLY WANT 72 VIRGINS AFTER ALL:

NYTIMES/AP: Israel poured up to 10,000 armored troops into south Lebanon Tuesday, and separately dropped helicopter-borne commandos deep into the eastern Bekaa Valley where they raided a Hezbollah-run hospital and fought pitched battles with guerrillas, in a major escalation of the three-week-old war.

After the raid on the ancient city of Baalbek ended, the Israeli military said it had captured some guerrillas and hit others. The military statement said all its soldiers returned unharmed to their base, but gave no further details.

I hope they get these cowardly jihadoscumbags to talk.

THE BUILDING COLLAPSE AT QANA; WHOSE VERSION DO YOU TRUST?

CONFEDERATE YANKEE ANALYZES SOME OF THE LEFT-WING ANALYSIS OF RIGHT-WING ANALYSIS OF THE QANA BOMBING. RTWT. Needless to say, he demolishes them.

Me? I find it very revealing that the "anti-war" Left in the USA takes the same position in this matter as Hizb'Allah. To me: THAT SAYS IT ALL.

Remember: Hizb'Allah is the unrepentent organization which bombed the US Marine Barracks in Beirut in 1983 - murdering more than two hundred US Marines who had beem sent to Lebanon to help stop the civil war, (a war instigated by Arafat).

People who support or trust them them, support or trust an organization that had murdered more Americans than any other terrorist group... until 9/11. Americans who support Hizb'Allah are dupes or traitors or both. Ditto those who ape Hizb'Allah PROPAGANDA.

FIGHTING TO WIN

THE AMERICAN THINKER:

Fighting to Win

FDR and General George Marshall – like Lincoln and General William Tecumseh Sherman before them – understood that once you make the decision to fight, you fight to win.

“We are not fighting armies but a hostile people,” Sherman wrote, “and we must make young and old, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war….I would make this war as severe as possible, and show no symptom of tiring till the South begs for mercy.”

Indeed, this is precisely what Sherman was talking about when he famously said that “War is hell.” He was a decent, honorable man who hated doing what he knew must be done to end the war and stop the killing. Here’s one Sherman quote you won’t see in a New York Times editorial:

“The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.”

When you’re in the middle of a war, of course you need to think before you act. But there is such a thing as over-thinking, and today we are in serious danger of making this mistake. In war there is nothing – absolutely nothing – that brings victory faster and more completely than the total annihilation of your enemy. Do that and everything else – what the late, great Senator Sam Ervine of North Carolina once called “the complex complexities” – sort themselves out.

Right now we have an unexpected opportunity to obliterate Hezbollah, and by doing so to increase our chances for victory in Afghanistan and Iraq. We’d be fools not to go for it.

RTWT.

MORE BLATANT MEDIA BIAS EXPOSED: NYTIMES CONCEALS THE TRUTH TO SMEAR BUSH AND HELP THE DEMS

VIKINGPUNDIT EXPOSES ANOTHER INSTANCE OF BLATANT BIAS IN SO-CALLED "NEWS REPORTING" AT THE NYTIMES.

PROOF THAT THE LOOSE CHANGE CONSPIRACISTS ARE INSANE AND WRONG

MICHELE MALKIN, (over at HOT AIR) LINKED TO THIS: Simple logical proof that the "Reichstag theories" of 9/11 are ididotic. RTWT.

HERE'S MORE LOGICAL PROOF:

IF THE BUSH CRIME FAMILY COULDN'T KEEP THE NSA THING A SECRET, THEN HOW COULD THEY KEEP THEIR 9/11 PLOT A SECRET? IOW: WHY IS THERE NOT A SINGLE WHISTLEBLOWER?

And, WHY COULDN'T THEY/DIDN'T JUST PLANT WMD IN IRAQ?

WHY?!?!?!? It's simple: 9/11 was perpetrated by Osama's gang of jihadomaniacs, by those who openly take credit for it - and for the reasons they avow.

People who believe it was an inside job - like the Reichstag - are more frightened of the GOP than al Qaeda. Which is NUTS. What's especially frightening to me, is two things: (1) that these nuts are gaining control of the Democrat Party. And (2) that there are tens of millions of them in the USA and even more of them in Europe. These are the very same folks who blame Israel for all the mayhem in the Middle East.

I think the most basic reason that so many people have a diathesis for this insane bit of paranoia is that they were brainwashed (over the last 40 years) into post-modern Leftism by the academy and the MSM. (Read Bruce Bawer's book for an excellent descritpionh of the Left's hold on both of these institutions in Europe.)

Post-modern Leftism has convinced them that the West is evil, that the West is responsible for Third World poverty, and for "Global Warming" - and that it deserves to be brought down a notch, at the very least. They believe - like the jihadomaniacs - that the West should be on the same plane as any and all other cultures, and be made subservient to the "international community" which a euphemism for giving the world a veto over American foreign policy.

These post-modern Leftists believe that the West - ruled by Bush for now - perpetrated slavery and genocide and colonialism in the past, and "so of course they would do worse things now."

The premise is false: The WORST genocide was perpetrated WITHIN the Third World, not by the West. Slavery was invented in the East and ENDED by the West. Colonialism did not bankrupt the Third World; their poverty is due to a lack of transparency, a lack of industrialism, and a lack of free markets.

The post-modern Left's attack on the West's COUNTER-ATTACK against the jihadomaniacs is making it tougher for us to rally the assets and energies necessary to win a victory. And if they were to win Congress or the White House, they would end our counter-attack, and begin a policy of appeasement and capitulation and this would lead to our defeat. Which is why I have been saying OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN: to defeat the enemy we have to defeat the Left.

WASH POST OP-ED BY THAT OLD ASSHOLE JIMMY CARTER

"Jimmy the dhimmi" is promoting a negotiated "long-term, two-state agreement" with the enemy - as if the enemy wants a two-state solution! WHAT AN EFFIN' MORON! Hizb'Allah does NOT want a two-state solution - nor does Hamas or Syria or Iran. Saying we should stop fighting to TALK to these jihadomaniacs is idiotic.

The hostilities will cease - and negotiations begin - only AFTER the enemy is utterly defeated. And, if that defeat doesn't happen now, then it will happen sometime in the near future.

UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER by the jihadomaniancs is the essential predicate for peace. Only the IDF DEFEATING them will ever bring peace. Talk will not bring peace.

And idiotic OP-ED articles - like this one by an ex-president whose single term was a TOTAL FAILURE -- and on whose watch jihadoterrorism we know it began, AND WENT UNANSWERED, (in Iran and Afghanistan and Iraq) -- will bring us nothing but snickers from the enemy, snickering at the words of appeasemnt and accomodation emanating from the pen of their favorite dhimmi.

Chamberlain was wrong to talk to "Herr Hitler." And any pact negotiated with Hizb'Allah or Hamas or Assad or Iran will be worth as much. And be just as HARMFUL: The Munich Pact gave Hitler the Sudatenland and another year to arm. It made the cost of defeating Germany GREATER. Any deal with Hizb'Allah would do the same. THIS IS ALWAYS THE CASE: APPEASEMENT ALWAYS ONLY HELPS THE ENEMY.

When Carter helped Clinton appease with Kim Jong Il it made the Korean peninsula and the "far east" MORE dangerous, not less.

Carter should shut the hell up and go back to growing peanuts and writing awful poetry.

MORE HERE - from Israel.

MIGHT ISRAEL - AND THE US - LOSE THE GWOT?

Excerpt:

The division of America is the greatest threat to our ability to prevail in the War on Terror – and the Left knows this and is incited by it. America is not divided enough for the American Left, which is now in full purge mode in Connecticut, where it is attempting to bring down the one statesman in the Democratic Party who might re-unite this country in the face of its enemies.

Those who in the midst of these wars clamor for ceasefires with an implacable foe, those who call for withdrawals that would leave sovereign states in the hands of the terrorist forces, those who decry civilian casualties caused by the only forces in this war who do not target civilians, those Blame-America-Firsters who exploit the Abu Ghraibs on our side and not their atrocities, those whose hysterical fear of the conflict we face takes the form of pathological denial and projects the rabid hatred of the enemy for us onto our own commander in the war, are destined to have a lot to answer for before this conflict is over. [UMPH ADDED.]

RTWT. What we must do now is DESTROY the enemy, annihilate Hizb'Allah. And then target Assad. One way... or another...

MUST READ OF THE DAY: "The war in Lebanon must not end short of its logical conclusion."

EXCERPT:

The pressures of European leaders and the United Nations for a quick fix -- an accommodation of evil of the sort they historically have prefered to acting with determination against a nascent threat -- must not be allowed to stop Israel, with our support, from completing this dirty job.

To end the present suffering of its people , Lebanon cannot be allowed to remain a defacto Shiite-extremist state, dominated by Syria and Iran. An international peacekeeping force cannot be brought in until the root of war is dug out, and Hezbollah is destroyed or effectively removed from Lebanon.

RTWT.

HIZBALLAH GOT MOST OF THEIR WEAPONS ON BUSH'S AND SHARON'S WATCH

BUSH:

The current crisis is part of a larger struggle between the forces of freedom and the forces of terror in the Middle East. For decades, the status quo in the Middle East permitted tyranny and terror to thrive. And as we saw on September the 11th, the status quo in the Middle East led to death and destruction in the United States, and it had to change. So America is opposing the forces of terror and promoting the cause of democracy across the broader Middle East.

This is true. But George, Arik: WHAT THE EFF WERE YOU TWO GUYS THINKING THE LAST FIVE YEARS AS IRAN ARMED THESE JIHADOMANIAICS!?

As I have written many times the last few weeks: jobs left undone or half-done only get worse.

IT'S TIME TO DESTROY OUR ENEMIES - BEFORE THEY GET ANY MORE POWERFUL. And I mean Hamas and Fatah and Hizballah and alAksa and alQaeda and all the other jihaodthugs. INCLUDING IRAN.

MY POINT: This UNSC RES is BS. The time for action is past due.

UNHINGED? I REPORT; YOU DECIDE

"IT IS A CLASH BETWEEN THE CIVILIZED AND THE PRIMITIVE; BETWEEN RATIONALITY AND BARBARTIY... ONLY MUSLIMS DEFEND THEIR BELIEFS BY BURNING DOWN CHURCHES, KILLING PEOPLE AND DESTROYING EMBASSIES..."

This is an excerpt from a TV appearance by Wafa al Sultan - a former Muslim, a woman. And brave. Not unhinged - even though she speaks LOUDLY, in CAPS so-to-speak. She speaks the truth, BLUNTLY. And calls a spade a spade. She doesn't try to soften the blow by diluting the truth. VIDEO HERE.

UNHINGED? OR JUST REALISTIC?

PASTORIUS ASKS:

How Long Will We Wait Before We Really Begin To Fight?

Mona Charen answers:

Our people are beheaded on videotape and the world ignores it. We fail to offer the full panoply of the Bill of Rights to the beheaders and the world groans at the inhumanity of it all.

The United Nations Security Council condemns Israel for defending herself from naked aggression and manages to overlook Chechnya, the Chinese occupation of Tibet, every terrorist attack against Israel, the massacre in Rwanda, the Indonesian occupation of East Timor, Serbian acts in Bosnia, and pretty much the entire continent of Africa, which as Kofi Annan surely knows better than most, is a human rights cesspool. ...

There are millions of Americans who are not deluded by this madness (and we draw our military recruits from their ranks), and yet you cannot escape the times you live in.

[Pastorius:] ... the longer we wait, the worse things will be when that time comes. Everyday we wait, I become more and more despondent over the destruction to come.

Our victory is inevitable. I have no question about that. My sadness is for the millions, maybe hundreds of millions of dead and maimed who will pay the price for their silence in the face of rising fascism.

Permanent Link | Posted by Pastorius

And I abosfrigginlutley agree. Those who want us to temper our counter-attacks in order to appease so-called moderates ANYWHERE are fools and they are costing US and our allies lives.

FDR and Truman knew how to fight and win: you fight with everyhtong you've got, and until the enemy is erased or surrenders UNCONDITIONALLY.

In my book: both Olmert and Bush are both moderates who verge on the dovish. We let OBl get away from Torabora - we should NUKED HIM. We shoujld whacked Moki al Sadr in 2003 after he assassinated a more moderate rival. We should whacked Hizballah after they blew up Khobar Towers. And so on...

Everytime anyone - throughout ALL of human - history has been too soft on an enemy, the enemy has come back to bite him, and WORSE than he might otherwise have done.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT CHURHCILL WARNED THE WEST ABOUT IN 1938: he said that they could confront Hitler in 1938 - and have a small war, or later and lose millions.

Sadly, most people called him UNHINGED and a WARMONGERER. But history proved him right. Reagan was called a warmongerer - in the Cold War. He didnlt end it; HE WON IT! Goldwater was also accused of being unhinged, but in retrospect: HE WAS RIGHT - and in your heart... you know it.

Pastorius GETS IT RIGHT, TOO! Read him here and here.